USPTO serial 78812961
HANDY RECOVERY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HUSSAIN, TASNEEM
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 118- EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with HANDY RECOVERY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Novosibirsk, RU
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Dmitri I. Dubograev
DMITRI I DUBOGRAEV INTERNATIONAL LEGAL COUNSELS PC901 N PITT ST STE 325ALEXANDRIA, VA 22314-1549UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | computer utility software; downloadable computer software and other computer software for recovery of electronic data | ACTIVE | Jul 6, 2004 |
| 035 | Operating a website providing information in the fields of marketing, distributing, and licensing data recovery software; licensing of data recovery software; marketing services, namely providing informational web pages designed to generate sales traffic via hyperlinks to other web sites; online retail store services featuring downloadable data recovery software. | ACTIVE | Jul 6, 2004 |
| 042 | Internet-based services namely file and data recovery services in conjunction with data recovery software; operating a website providing technical operating information in the field of downloading data recovery software; operating a website for providing interactive technical support services relating thereto. | ACTIVE | Jul 6, 2004 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 15, 2021 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 15, 2021 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 4, 2021 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 3, 2021 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 29, 2020 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 28, 2020 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 28, 2020 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 27, 2020 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 25, 2019 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 25, 2019 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 24, 2019 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 24, 2019 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 23, 2018 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 22, 2018 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 20, 2018 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 20, 2018 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 20, 2017 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 20, 2017 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 19, 2017 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 18, 2017 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 18, 2016 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 18, 2016 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 14, 2016 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 14, 2016 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 13, 2015 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 13, 2015 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 13, 2015 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Apr 10, 2015 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 10, 2015 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 9, 2014 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Apr 7, 2014 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Oct 1, 2013 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Apr 1, 2013 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Sep 27, 2012 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Sep 21, 2012 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 20, 2012 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 20, 2012 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 16, 2012 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 15, 2011 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 15, 2011 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 15, 2011 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 15, 2011 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 13, 2010 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 13, 2010 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 11, 2010 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 11, 2010 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 10, 2009 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 10, 2009 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 29, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 10, 2009 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Sep 8, 2008 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Mar 6, 2008 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Oct 25, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 6, 2007 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Mar 6, 2007 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 5, 2007 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 1, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 1, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 1, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 1, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 2, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 2, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 2, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 17, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |