USPTO serial 78813077
NEUSTAR
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FATHY, DOMINIC
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with NEUSTAR?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Peter J. Riebling
Peter J. Riebling Katten Muchin Rosenman LLPSuite 2002900 K Street, N.W.Washington, DC 20007-5118Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | DOWNLOADABLE SOUND RECORDINGS, MUSIC RECORDINGS, VIDEO AND VIDEO RECORDINGS, FEATURING SPORTS, MUSIC, NEWS, ENTERTAINMENT, GENERAL FEATURE, CURRENT EVENTS, WEATHER, TECHNOLOGY, ARTS AND ANIMATION, ELECTRONIC GAME PROGRAMS, LOGOS, SCREENSAVERS, RING TONES AND BELL TONES FOR MOBILE TELEPHONES VIA A GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORK AND WIRELESS DEVICES; ELECTRONIC GAME PROGRAMS; COMPUTER GAME SOFTWARE AND PROGRAMS; VIDEO AND AUDIO SOFTWARE FOR COMPUTERS, ELECTRONIC DEVICES, WIRELESS DEVICES, TELEPHONES, GAMES, MULTI-PURPOSE CONSOLES, PORTABLE GAMING SYSTEMS, MOBILE HANDSETS, AND PERSONAL DIGITAL ASSISTANTS; SOFTWARE FOR USE IN ORGANIZING, TRANSMITTING, MANIPULATING, AND REVIEWING AUDIO, VIDEO, MULTIMEDIA, ELECTRONIC DIGITAL SIGNAL TRANSMISSIONS AND BROADCASTS, TEXT, AND DATA FILES ON PORTABLE AND HANDHELD DIGITAL ELECTRONIC AND WIRELESS DEVICES; COMPUTER SOFTWARE FOR THE FACILITATION OF SHORT MESSAGING SERVICES (SMS), MOBILE IP ON-LINE INTERNET AND DIRECT RESPONSE RELATED APPLICATIONS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 4, 2010 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 4, 2010 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 19, 2009 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 19, 2009 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| May 29, 2009 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| May 29, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Nov 25, 2008 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 25, 2008 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Nov 25, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Nov 3, 2008 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 15, 2008 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| May 15, 2008 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| May 15, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Nov 26, 2007 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 26, 2007 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Nov 26, 2007 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 29, 2007 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 10, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 6, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 14, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 12, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 10, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 18, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 18, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 17, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 17, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 18, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 17, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 15, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 20, 2006 | MDSM | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Feb 22, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |