USPTO serial 78813341
XO BLOW
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BUTTON, JENNIFER JO
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 113 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with XO BLOW?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
SETH P. MARKOWITZ
SETH P MARKOWITZ MARKOWITZ & ROSHCO LLP530 5TH AVE FL 23NEW YORK, NY 10036-5101UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | HAIR CARE PREPARATIONS FOR CLEANSING, CONDITIONING, STRENGTHENING, SHAPING, STRAIGHTENING, WAVING, CURLING, STYLING, SETTING, HOLDING, MOISTURIZING, TEXTURIZING, THICKENING, THINNING, RECONSTRUCTING, PERFUMING, COLORING, TINTING, BLEACHING AND REMOVING HAIR, NAMELY, SHAMPOO, HAIR CONDITIONER, HAIR MOUSSE, STYLING GEL AND CREAMS AND LOTIONS FOR THE HAIR; BATH AND SPA PREPARATIONS, NAMELY, BATH OIL, SOAP, POWDER, MASSAGE OIL AND CREAM, SKIN LOTION, BODY OIL AND SKIN CREAM; COSMETIC PREPARATIONS, NAMELY, LIP GLOSS, LIP STICK, LIP BALM, LIP PENCIL, CONCEAL CREAM, PRESSED POWDER, EYE PENCILS, BLUSH, MASCARA, FOUNDATIONS, EYE SHADOW, FINGERNAIL POLISH; AND, MEN'S AND WOMEN'S FRAGRANCES | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 14, 2007 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 14, 2007 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 16, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 16, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 2, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 17, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |