USPTO serial 78813792
VIRTUAL GUARD
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SHARPERSON, KENNETH
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 103 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with VIRTUAL GUARD?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 045 | Security services, namely, providing mobile, on-site electronic surveillance services for security purposes with interactive video monitoring and recording, still picture cameras, video cameras, and access to a global computer network in the fields of warehouses, office buildings, residential buildings, commercial buildings, warehouse building sites, office building sites, residential building sites, commercial building sites, land-based oil rigs, construction sites, demolition sites, bridges, security checkpoints, weigh stations, electrical substations, water treatment centers, waste treatment centers, dams, airports, parking lots, hydroelectric facilities, live entertainment events, live sporting events, live festivals, pipelines, railroad crossings, land-based vehicle roadways, ports-of-entry, border crossings; Mobile surveillance equipment, namely, a mobile surveillance system including video and still picture cameras for collecting video and still picture surveillance data, and a computer system for operating the cameras, archiving the surveillance data, and transmitting and distributing the surveillance data via a digital network | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 12, 2007 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 12, 2007 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 9, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 9, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 2, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 21, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |