Drawing for HYBRID COMFORT SYSTEM

USPTO serial 78814231

HYBRID COMFORT SYSTEM

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
PEETE, KYLE C
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 112 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with HYBRID COMFORT SYSTEM?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

John H. Weber

JOHN H WEBER BAKER & HOSTETLER LLPWASHINGTON SQ STE 11001050 CONNECTICUT AVE NWWASHINGTON, DC 20036

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
011Air conditioning, ventilation and heating products and parts thereforACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 25, 2006MAB1ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT—
Sep 25, 2006ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Sep 22, 2006EXARTEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED—
Aug 1, 2006GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 1, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 22, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 22, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 18, 2006MDSCNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED—
Apr 17, 2006ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 17, 2006REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Feb 22, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance