USPTO serial 78814539
MY DAILY DIRECTOR LIFE PLANNER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SNYDER, NELSON B
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 107 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with MY DAILY DIRECTOR LIFE PLANNER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jay R. Hamilton
JAY R HAMILTON LAW OFFICE OF JAY R HAMILTON PLCNVC STE 120331 W 3RD STDAVENPORT, IA 52801Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Electronic publications, namely, magazines, books, calendars, scheduling devices and manuals featuring My Daily Director recorded on computer media; Pre-recorded CD's, video tapes, laser disks and DVD's featuring My Daily Director | ACTIVE | — |
| 016 | Manuals, calendars, scheduling devices and daytimers in the field of Personal Development, Spiritual Guidance and Business Training | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | Personal coaching services in the field of Personal Development, Spiritual Guidance and Business Development; Workshops and seminars in the field of Personal Development, Spritual Guidance and Business Development | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 2, 2007 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 2, 2007 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 4, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 4, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 3, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 12, 2006 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 23, 2006 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Feb 22, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |