Drawing for WRAP 'N ROLL

USPTO serial 78814560

WRAP 'N ROLL

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
HENRY, NAKIA D
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 129 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with WRAP 'N ROLL?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Nicholas A. Pandiscio

NICHOLAS A PANDISCIO PANDISCIO & PANDISCIO PC470 TOTTEN POND RD STE 4WALTHAM, MA 02451-1933UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
021Plastic covered containers with plastic inserts for wrapping material sold as a unit for domestic use, namely, inserts made of plastic to allow multiple rolls of paper or foil wrapping materials to be stored and rotated in a plastic container with a removable cover, whereby the wrapping material may be unwound and severed from the rolls when the cover is removed; plastic inserts for use with plastic storage containers, namely, inserts made of plastic to allow multiple rolls of paper or foil wrapping materials to be stored and rotated in a plastic container with a removable cover, whereby the wrapping material may be unwound and severed from the rolls when the cover is removedACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 19, 2012ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Jan 9, 2008MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 6, 2007ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 11, 2007ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Mar 13, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 16, 2007NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Dec 20, 2006ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Oct 24, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 4, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Sep 7, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Sep 1, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Aug 29, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 28, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Aug 21, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 21, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 3, 2006CPRAPRIORITY ACTION MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Aug 3, 2006CPRAPRIORITY ACTION WRITTENA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Aug 3, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 22, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance