USPTO serial 78815841
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
CASHFLOW TECHNOLOGIES, INC., A NEVADA CORPORATION
SCOTTSDALE, AZ
Other trademarks owned by CASHFLOW TECHNOLOGIES, INC., A NEVADA CORPORATION
CASHFLOW TECHNOLOGIES, INC., A NEVADA CORPORATION
SCOTTSDALE, AZ
Other trademarks owned by CASHFLOW TECHNOLOGIES, INC., A NEVADA CORPORATION
Scottsdale, AZ
JACKSON, WY
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
David E. Rogers
DAVID E ROGERS SQUIRE, SANDERS & DEMPSEY LLPTWO RENAISSANCE SQ 40 N CENTRAL AVEPHOENIX, AZ 85004UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Software, video tapes, audio tapes, CD-ROMs, DVDs, laser discs, providing information via a global computer network; Printed materials, books, booklets; pamphlets, magazines, brochures, manuals, teaching materials, instructional materials; Financial services, educational services, seminars, classes, conferences, workshops, entertainment services, providing electronically available information via a global computer network, electronic publishing services | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 25, 2009 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Nov 18, 2009 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jan 16, 2007 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 16, 2007 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 19, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 16, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 6, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 29, 2006 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Feb 22, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |