USPTO serial 78816413
FLYING A GARAGE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MANOR, THOMAS M
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 110 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with FLYING A GARAGE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Thomas D. Foster
THOMAS D FOSTER TDFOSTER12760 HIGH BLUFF DR STE 300SAN DIEGO, CA 92130-2019UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | Clothing, namely, denim shirts, jackets, polo shirts, sweat shirts, sweatsuits, and T-shirts, skirts, pants, dresses, belts, neckties, footwear; headwear, namely, hats and caps | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 2, 2008 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jun 2, 2008 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jun 2, 2008 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Mar 5, 2008 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Oct 9, 2007 | GNSN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 9, 2007 | GNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 9, 2007 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 10, 2007 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jun 19, 2007 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 19, 2007 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 19, 2007 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 18, 2007 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jun 6, 2007 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| May 16, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 24, 2007 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 24, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 20, 2007 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Apr 20, 2007 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Mar 6, 2007 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 6, 2007 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 8, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 7, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 7, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 20, 2006 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 20, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 14, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 2, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 2, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 11, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 11, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 7, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 23, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |