CopyMark Law Group
4.9/5
Drawing for PEPPACO

USPTO serial 78816432

PEPPACO

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MURRAY, DAVID T
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with PEPPACO?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Trademark Monitoring
(312) 319-4460
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Start a new application
(312) 319-4460

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Scott D. Woldow

Scott D. Woldow SMITH, GAMBRELL & RUSSELL, LLP1055 Thomas Jefferson St., NWSuite 400WASHINGTON, DC 20007

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
029Preserved, dried and cooked fruits and vegetables; jellies; jams; fruit preserves; cranberry sauce, apple sauce; pickles; processed peppers, namely, pickled peppers, stuffing peppers and stuffed peppersACTIVE—
030Fruit sauces excluding cranberry and apple sauce; salad dressingACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 30, 2013TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Mar 15, 2010MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 15, 2010ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 15, 2009EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Aug 7, 2009EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Aug 7, 2009EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Feb 20, 2009EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Feb 20, 2009AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Feb 9, 2009EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Feb 7, 2009EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Jul 17, 2008EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Jul 17, 2008EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Jul 17, 2008EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Feb 21, 2008EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Feb 5, 2008EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Feb 5, 2008EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Aug 7, 2007NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
May 15, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 25, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Mar 17, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Mar 17, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 17, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 16, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Feb 8, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 8, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 8, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 8, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 7, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 23, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance