USPTO serial 78816448
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Martha Gayle Barber
MARTHA GAYLE BARBER ALSTON & BIRD LLP101 S TRYON ST STE 4000CHARLOTTE, NC 28280-4000UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 006 | BATHROOM HARDWARE AND ACCESSORIES MADE OF METAL, NAMELY, METAL ROBE HOOKS, METAL SHELF BRACKETS, METAL HOOKS | ACTIVE | — |
| 020 | BED PILLOWS, DECORATIVE PILLOWS, LAUNDRY HAMPERS, NON-METAL ROBE HOOKS, FITTED FABRIC FURNITURE SLIPCOVERS, AND BATHROOM SHELVES; NON-METAL SHOWER CURTAIN HOOKS; SHOWER CURTAIN RINGS | ACTIVE | — |
| 021 | BATHROOM ACCESSORIES, NAMELY, SOAP DISHES, TOOTHBRUSHES HOLDERS, WASTEBASKETS, BATHROOM TUMBLERS, LOTION PUMP DISPENSERS SOLD EMPTY, TOWEL BARS, TISSUE HOLDERS, BATH AND SHOWER CADDIES | ACTIVE | — |
| 024 | BED LINENS, NAMELY, BED SHEETS, PILLOW CASES, BED SHEET SETS, PILLOW SHAMS, BED BLANKETS, BLANKET THROWS, COMFORTERS, DOWN COMFORTERS, QUILTS, DUVETS, DUVET COVERS, COVERLETS, BED SKIRTS, MATTRESS PADS; INFANT AND JUVENILE BEDDING, NAMELY, BED SHEETS, PILLOW CASES, SHEET SETS, PILLOW SHAMS, BED BLANKETS, BLANKET THROWS, COMFORTERS, DOWN COMFORTERS, QUILTS, DUVETS, DUVET COVERS, COVERLETS, BED SKIRTS, MATTRESS PADS; UNFITTED FABRIC FURNITURE SLIPCOVERS; BATH TOWELS, BATH SHEETS, WASH CLOTHS, BEACH TOWELS; SHOWER CURTAINS; FABRIC WINDOW COVERINGS AND TREATMENTS, NAMELY, WINDOW VALANCES AND SHEER WINDOW PANELS | ACTIVE | — |
| 027 | BATH RUGS, WOVEN RUGS, BATH MATS, RUBBER BATHTUB MATS, AND RUG PADS | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 30, 2008 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 30, 2008 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 28, 2007 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 5, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 16, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 2, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 2, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 29, 2007 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 29, 2007 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 29, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 20, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 20, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 20, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 12, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 8, 2006 | GPRA | PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Aug 8, 2006 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION WRITTEN | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Aug 7, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 23, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |