USPTO serial 78816455
C
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- YONTEF, DAVID ERIC
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 105 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with C?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
George G. Grigel
GEORGE G GRIGELWELLS ST JOHN PS601 W 1ST AVE STE 1300SPOKANE, WA 99201Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Cosmetological products for body and face skin care, namely, creams; gels, namely, skin gels for accelerating, enhancing or extending tans, shaving gel, hair gel, and eye gel; and lotions for makeup removal; day and night creams and gels; concentrates and masks, namely, beauty masks, body mask cream and skin mask; serums, namely, beauty serums and non-medicated skin serums; erasing creams, namely anti-aging cream, anti-freckle cream and anti-wrinkle cream; firming and moisturizing body, skin, face and eye creams; non-medicated skin creams to prevent stretch marks; bio-stimulant body, skin, face and eye creams; exfoliating creams and gels; hand creams; alcohol-free toning lotions for the face; beauty masks; gel soaps for the body and hair; revitalizing, astringent and moisturizing face, skin and body creams contained in ampules; make-up removal and eyeliner creams; regenerating body oils; body slenderizing products, namely, reducing gels; toning gels; thermo-active slimming concentrates, namely, creams and lotions for cellulite reduction; wrinkle products, namely, firming creams; firming face, skin and body creams contained in ampules; body, skin, face and eye creams with mink oil; depilatory products, namely, hair-removal creams; tanning products, namely, milks; gels and creams for sun protection; after sun care, namely, after-sun creams and lotions; self-tanning preparations; shaving creams; and after-shave lotions | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 18, 2008 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 18, 2008 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 21, 2007 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 21, 2007 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 21, 2007 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 21, 2007 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 21, 2007 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 21, 2007 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 21, 2007 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 21, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 2, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 2, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 2, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 2, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 10, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 10, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 7, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 23, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |