USPTO serial 78816467
ATTILA THE HAM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- EVANKO, PATRICIA MALESARDI
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ATTILA THE HAM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
woodland hills, CA
woodland hills, CA
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 028 | Bath toys; Bathtub toys; Battery operated action toys; Bendable toys; Clockwork toys ; Clockwork toys ; Collectable toy figures; Drawing toys; Fantasy character toys; Infant action crib toys; Infant toys; Inflatable bath toys; Inflatable ride-on toys; Inflatable thin rubber toys; Inflatable toys; Inflatable toys showing decorative pictures; Lever action toys; Mechanical action toys; Mechanical toys; Miniature toy helmets; Modeled plastic toy figurines; Molded toy figures; Music box toys; Musical toys; Non-riding transportation toys; Party favors in the nature of small toys; Pet toys made of rope; Plastic character toys; Play mats containing infant toys; Play mats for use with toy vehicles; Plush toys; Pop up toys; Positionable toy figures; Printing toys; Pull toys; Punching toys; Push toys; Radio controlled toy vehicles; Ride-on toys; Rubber character toys; Sand toys; Sandbox toys; Sketching toys; Soft sculpture plush toys; Soft sculpture toys; Squeezable squeaking toys; Squeeze toys; Stacking toys; Stuffed toy animals; Stuffed toys; Talking toys; Tesselation toys; Tossing disc toys; Toy action figures; Toy action figures and accessories therefor; Toy animals and accessories therefore; Toy armor; Toy artificial fingernails; Toy banks; Toy boxes; Toy building blocks; Toy construction blocks; Toy construction sets; Toy figures; Toy furniture; Toy harmonicas; Toy hoop sets; Toy houses; Toy mail boxes; Toy masks; Toy mobiles; Toy model cars; Toy model hobbycraft kits; Toy model kit cars; Toy model vehicles and related accessories sold as units; Toy modeling dough; Toy prism glasses; Toy putty; Toy record players; Toy robots; Toy rockets; Toy scooters; Toy sets of carpenters' tools; Toy snow globes; Toy stamps; Toy swords; Toy trains and parts and accessories therefor; Toy vehicles; Toy vehicles and accessories therefor; Toy vehicles with transforming parts; Toy watches; Toy water globes; Toy weapons; Toy wind socks ; Toy, namely, battery-powered computer game with LCD screen which features animation and sound effects; Toys, namely, a disk to toss in playing a game wherein other disks are flipped and collected; Transforming robotic toy vehicles; Transforming robotic toys; Water squirting toys; Wind-up toys; Wind-up walking toys | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 10, 2008 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 10, 2008 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 8, 2008 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jan 15, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 26, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 10, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 10, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 2, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 2, 2007 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 2, 2007 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 2, 2007 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 2, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 6, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 6, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 22, 2007 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Mar 22, 2007 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 5, 2007 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 5, 2007 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 7, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 7, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 7, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 23, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |