Drawing for 7M21

USPTO serial 78816546

7M21

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
โ€”
Examiner
MEIER, SHARON A
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with 7M21?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Donald F. Frei

Donald F. Frei WOOD, HERRON & EVANS, L.L.P.2700 CAREW TOWER441 VINE STREETCINCINNATI, OH 45202-2917

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
025Clothing, namely, pants and shortsACTIVEโ€”

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited ยง2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 21, 2009MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 19, 2009ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 17, 2008EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTEDโ€”
Jun 17, 2008EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILEDโ€”
Jun 17, 2008EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Dec 18, 2007NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline โ€” usually six months from the notice date.
Sep 25, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 5, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATIONโ€”
Aug 10, 2007PBPRWITHDRAWN FROM PUB - ESU SUPERVISOR REQUESTโ€”
Aug 10, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETEDโ€”
Aug 9, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTERโ€”
Aug 9, 2007XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTEREDโ€”
Aug 9, 2007GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILEDโ€”
Aug 9, 2007GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILEDโ€”
Aug 9, 2007CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTENโ€”
Aug 9, 2007ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWNโ€”
Aug 7, 2007PBCRWITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERYโ€”
Jul 23, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETEDโ€”
Jul 22, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTERโ€”
Jan 22, 2007GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILEDโ€”
Jan 22, 2007CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTENโ€”
Jan 19, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTEREDโ€”
Jan 19, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIEโ€”
Dec 19, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICEโ€”
Dec 19, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action โ€” typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 22, 2006GEAPEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDโ€”
Jun 22, 2006CPEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT AND/OR PRIORITY ACTION - COMPLETEDโ€”
Jun 18, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINERโ€”
Feb 23, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTEREDโ€”

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance