Drawing for CLEARADVANTAGE

USPTO serial 78816747

CLEARADVANTAGE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BUCHANAN WILL, NORA
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 116 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CLEARADVANTAGE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

David M. Perry

DAVID M PERRY BLANK ROME LLP1 LOGAN SQUAREPHILADELPHIA, PA 19103-6998UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
001CHEMICALS FOR TREATING SWIMMING POOL AND SPA WATERACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 22, 2009MAB1ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT—
Jun 20, 2009ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
May 27, 2009EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
May 27, 2009EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Jan 15, 2009GEA1NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Jan 15, 2009GECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Jan 15, 2009CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED—
Dec 1, 2008EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Dec 1, 2008JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Nov 26, 2008EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
May 16, 2008GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
May 16, 2008GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 16, 2008CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 23, 2008ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Apr 23, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 18, 2008MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 11, 2007GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 11, 2007GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 11, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 23, 2007RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Aug 23, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Feb 20, 2007RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Aug 9, 2006GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Aug 9, 2006CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Aug 5, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 23, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance