USPTO serial 78816943
SLY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- POVARCHUK, REBECCA JOYCE
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 115 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SLY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
BRIAN H. BATZLI
BRIAN H. BATZLI MERCHANT & GOULDPO BOX 2910MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55402-0910UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | Clothing not used in connection with or for the promotion of the sport of basketball, namely, bandanas, bathrobes, belts, belts made of leather, bikinis, blouses, blousons, boots, bottoms, brassieres, camisoles, caps, coats, corsets, coveralls, denim jackets, denim pants, down jackets, dress shirts, dress suits, dresses, ear muffs, fitted swimming costumes with bra cups, flight suits, footwear, fur coats and jackets, fur hats, fur muffs, fur stoles, golf caps, golf shirts, golf shoes, halter tops, hats, headwear, heels, hoods, jackets, jeans, jerseys, knit shirts, knitted caps, knitted underwear, ladies' underwear, leather coats, leather jackets, leather pants, leather shoes, leg warmers, lingerie, loungewear, mantles, miniskirts, mules, neck bands, neckerchiefs, neckties, negligees, nightwear, overalls, parkas, polo shirts, ponchos, pumps, rain boots, robes, sandals, shawls, shirts, shoes, shorts, short-sleeved or long-sleeved t-shirts, short-sleeved shirts, shoulder pads for clothing, skirts, socks, stockings, stoles, suits, suspenders, sweat pants, sweat shirts, sweaters, tank tops, ties, tops, tuxedos, t-shirts, underclothes, vests, v-neck sweaters, wraps, and wrist bands | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 16, 2008 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jun 14, 2008 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jun 14, 2008 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Mar 31, 2008 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Dec 10, 2007 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Dec 7, 2007 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 11, 2007 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jul 20, 2007 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 30, 2007 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 30, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 30, 2007 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jun 30, 2007 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jun 30, 2007 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jan 25, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 24, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 5, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 5, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 5, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 1, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 28, 2006 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 19, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 19, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 6, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 23, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |