Drawing for FAST COMPANY

USPTO serial 78816979

FAST COMPANY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
YOUNG, CARRIE SKYE
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with FAST COMPANY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Gary S. Raskin

GARY S. RASKIN RASKIN PETER RUBIN & SIMON, LLP1801 CENTURY PARK E STE 2300LOS ANGELES, CA 90067-2325UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
041Provision of non-downloadable on-going audio visual film and television programs via video on demand, television broadcast, cable television, broadband, internet, and mobile device servicesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 23, 2010CORVREVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE—
Feb 3, 2010MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Dec 16, 2009MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Nov 12, 2009EWAFTEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED-FIRM RETAINS—
Aug 17, 2009MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 17, 2009ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 13, 2009NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Dec 4, 2008TMBNTTAB RELEASE CASE TO TRADEMARKS—
Dec 4, 2008OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Dec 4, 2008OP.DOPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999—
May 8, 2008CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
May 8, 2008COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
May 8, 2008TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jun 15, 2007OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
May 15, 2007ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Apr 17, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 28, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
May 15, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
May 12, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
May 7, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 27, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Apr 18, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 18, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 4, 2006GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 4, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 3, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 23, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance