USPTO serial 78817777
LIPZ
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- DOMBROW, COLLEEN M
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 101 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with LIPZ?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Wolfboro Falls, NH
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Lawrence D. Bradley
LAWRENCE D BRADLEY HOLLAND & KNIGHT LLP10 ST JAMES AVE STE 1200BOSTON, MA 02116-3889UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 018 | All purpose sport bags; All-purpose athletic bags; All-purpose carrying bags; Animal carriers; Animal harnesses; Animal leashes; Athletic bags; Attache cases; Baby backpacks; Backpacks; Backpacks ; Bags and holdalls for sports clothing; Bags for carrying babies' accessories; Barrel bags; Beach bags; Billfolds; Book bags; Briefcases; Briefcases ; Briefcases ; Business card cases; Business cases; Calling card cases; Carry-all bags; Carry-on bags; Carryalls; Carrying cases; Carrying cases for documents; Change purses; Clothing for animals; Clothing for domestic pets; Collars for pets; Credit card cases; Daypacks; Diaper bags; Document cases; Dog apparel; Dog clothing; Dog collars; Dog leashes; Dog parkas; Dog shoes; Drawstring pouches; Duffel bags; Duffel bags for travel; Duffle bags; Evening handbags; Fanny packs; Flexible bags for garments; Folding briefcases; Garments for pets; Gym bags; Handbags; Hiking bags; Hipsacks; Imitation leather; Key case; Key cases; Key-cases of leather and skins; Kit bags; Knapsacks; Leashes for animals; Leather and imitation leather bags; Leather bags for merchandise packaging ; Leather bags, suitcases and wallets; Leather briefcases; Leather cases; Leather for shoes; Leather handbags; Leather key cases; Leather key chains; Leather purses; Luggage; Luggage tags; Multi-purpose purses; Name card cases; Overnight bags; Overnight cases; Overnight suitcases; Pet clothing; Pet collar accessories, namely, bows and charms; Pocketbooks; Pouches of leather; Purses; Purses ; Roll bags; Satchels; School bags; School book bags; School knapsacks; Schoolchildren's backpacks; Shoe bags for travel; Shoulder bags; Small backpacks; Small clutch purses; Small purses; Small suitcases; Sports bags; Sports packs; String bags for shopping; Thongs; Tote bags; Travel bags; Traveling bags; Travelling bags ; Travelling cases of leather; Waist bags; Waist packs; Wallets; Wallets ; Wallets with card compartments; Wine bags with handles for carrying or holding wine; Wrist mounted carryall bags; Wrist mounted purses | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 8, 2007 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 8, 2007 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 10, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 10, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 8, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 24, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |