USPTO serial 78818427
CHOCOLEANS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 4172129Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jul 10, 2012
- Examiner
- MCMORROW, JANICE LEE
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 115
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with CHOCOLEANS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
OREM, UT
OREM, UT
Orem, UT
Orem, UT
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Joseph P. Schilleci, Jr.
Joseph P. Schilleci, Jr. Schilleci & Tortorici, P.C.2821 2nd Avenue South, Suite EBirmingham, AL 35233UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | Diet capsules; Diet pills; Meal replacement and dietary supplement drink mixes; Meal replacement bars; Meal replacement drinks; Meal replacement powders; Meal replacement shakes; Medicated candies; Medicated candy; Medicated candy for appetite control, weight management; Nutritional drink mix for use as a meal replacement; Nutritional shakes for use as a meal substitute; Vitamin and mineral formed and packaged as bars; Vitamin and mineral supplements; Vitamin drops; Vitamin fortified beverages; Vitamin supplements | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Dec 1, 2004 |
| 030 | Candy; Candy bars; Candy mints; Candy with cocoa; Chocolate; Chocolate bars; Chocolate candies; Chocolate chips; Chocolate covered nuts; Chocolate fondue; Chocolate food beverages not being dairy-based or vegetable based; Chocolate mousse; Chocolate pastes; Chocolate powder; Chocolate syrup; Chocolate topping; Chocolate truffles; Chocolate-based fillings for cakes and pies; Chocolate-based ready-to-eat food bars; Filled chocolate; Hot chocolate; Milk chocolate | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Dec 1, 2004 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by SHATKINA, RUFINA
- Other trademarks owned by SHATKINA, RUFINA
- Other trademarks owned by Phytobase Nutritionals, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Phytobase Nutritionals, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 005
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Similar marks named CHOCOLEANS
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 20, 2023 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| May 2, 2019 | PRAN | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED NO RESPONSE REQUIRED | — |
| Feb 20, 2019 | EROP | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION-POST REG RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 20, 2018 | PRA8 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 | — |
| Jul 19, 2018 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 10, 2018 | ES8R | TEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 10, 2017 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 10, 2012 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jun 2, 2012 | SUNA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF STATEMENT OF USE E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 1, 2012 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 30, 2012 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 11, 2012 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| May 10, 2012 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| May 6, 2012 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| May 5, 2012 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Nov 10, 2011 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 9, 2011 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 7, 2011 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Nov 5, 2011 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Apr 14, 2011 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 13, 2011 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 12, 2011 | IROA | RESPONSE TO ITU OFFICE ACTION ENTERED | — |
| Apr 12, 2011 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 17, 2011 | INCE | ITU OFFICE ACTION ISSUED FOR EXTENSION REQUEST | — |
| Mar 9, 2011 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Mar 9, 2011 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Nov 11, 2010 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 10, 2010 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 2, 2010 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Nov 2, 2010 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 8, 2010 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 5, 2010 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 4, 2010 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| May 17, 2010 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| May 17, 2010 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| May 17, 2010 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| May 5, 2010 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Dec 4, 2009 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 3, 2009 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Nov 5, 2009 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Nov 5, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 15, 2009 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| May 5, 2009 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Feb 10, 2009 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 21, 2009 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 6, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 5, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 16, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 16, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 15, 2008 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 16, 2008 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Jun 16, 2008 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 16, 2008 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 8, 2008 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Nov 8, 2007 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| May 17, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 8, 2007 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| May 8, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 26, 2006 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 26, 2006 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 26, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 12, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 8, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 8, 2006 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 8, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 8, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 8, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 6, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 28, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |