USPTO serial 78819418
ADAPTIVE CLINICAL RESEARCH
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- PARKER, JUSTINE D
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 101 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with ADAPTIVE CLINICAL RESEARCH?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Health Decisions provides clinical trials services that are adaptive in terms of allowing the management and strategic directions to be fluid and readily adjusted based on what happens in the field on a daily basis; The fundamental concept is that management today is based on what happened in the field yesterday; In this case, the "field" includes clinical sites at which patients are examined and data recorded throughout the world; Health Decisions has the unique ability to collect numerous performance indices as well as data, to summarize this information in reports, and to make these reports available over the web within hours of when the measurements were made; In this sense, the term adaptive refers to the ability to respond very quickly and to change the way a study is managed, on both a day-to-day tactical measure as well as on a strategic level; An example of the former is that when enrollment strategies are working well at one site, this information quickly becomes apparent and can be shared with other sites; Through this method, Health Decisions has recently established several industry benchmarks for rapid enrollment of study subjects; An example of the latter is the ability to make very quick, overnight decisions on dose-escalation studies, reducing the time for such studies by 50% or more as compared to traditional timelines | ACTIVE | Aug 16, 2005 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 9, 2007 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 9, 2007 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 14, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 14, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 3, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 28, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |