Drawing for GOLD STANDARD

USPTO serial 78819472

GOLD STANDARD

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
TWOHIG, SHANNON MARIE
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 121

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with GOLD STANDARD?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

STEVEN A. ABREU

STEVEN A. ABREU SUNSTEIN KANN MURPHY & TIMBERS LLP125 SUMMER STREETBOSTON, MA 02110-1618UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Registration services, namely registration of credit cards and other personal information, namely bank and merchant account data; providing consumer consulting, advice, and information on identity theft and fraud prevention products and servicesACTIVE—
036Providing personal financial information, namely, credit histories, credit ratingsACTIVE—
045Fraud detection and prevention in the field of identity theft, namely, providing information to others concerning consumer and identity fraud and theft; providing consultation services, advice and information to assist others in protecting against identity fraud and identity theft; providing consulting services, advice and information on identity theft and fraud protection; providing interactive websites containing information related to consumer identity fraud and identity theftACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 14, 2010MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 14, 2010ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 10, 2009EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Dec 10, 2009AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Nov 24, 2009TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Nov 9, 2009EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Nov 9, 2009EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Apr 16, 2009EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Apr 16, 2009EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Apr 16, 2009EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Nov 26, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 21, 2008EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Oct 21, 2008EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Oct 21, 2008EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Apr 24, 2008EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Apr 24, 2008EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Apr 24, 2008EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Nov 13, 2007NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Aug 21, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 1, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
May 17, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
May 16, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
May 16, 2007XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
May 16, 2007GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
May 16, 2007CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
May 15, 2007ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Apr 11, 2007ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Apr 9, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Apr 6, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 6, 2007XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Apr 6, 2007GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Apr 6, 2007CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Mar 24, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 20, 2007ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Mar 20, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 20, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Feb 12, 2007MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 12, 2006GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 12, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 10, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 28, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance