Drawing for ASK.COM

USPTO serial 78820132

ASK.COM

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MICKLEBURGH, LINDA BOHANNON
Law office
TRADEMARK ASSISTANCE CENTER

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ASK.COM?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Rosemary S. Tarlton

ROSEMARY S. TARLTON MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP425 MARKET STREETSAN FRANCISCO, CA 94105-2482UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
038Telecommunication services, namely, telephone communications services and delivery of messages by electronic mail transmission; providing on-line electronic bulletin boards and chat rooms for the transmission of messages among computer users in the field of general interest; broadcasting of audio, video and multimedia content by means of cellular, wireless communications and computer networks; electronic transmission of data, images, documents and messages via computer terminals; electronic data messagingACTIVE—
042Providing customized on-line web pages featuring user-defined information, which includes search engines and online web links to other websites; providing links to websites of others in the field of computers and technology; computer services, namely, providing search engines for obtaining data on global computer networkACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 17, 2009MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 16, 2009ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 17, 2008EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Jul 10, 2008EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Jul 10, 2008EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jan 9, 2008EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jan 9, 2008EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jan 9, 2008EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jul 17, 2007NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Apr 24, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 4, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Mar 1, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Feb 26, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 26, 2007XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Feb 23, 2007CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Feb 23, 2007CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Feb 6, 2007ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Feb 5, 2007PBCRWITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY—
Jan 5, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Dec 26, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 6, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Dec 6, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Nov 13, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Nov 9, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 9, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 8, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 8, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 20, 2006MDSMNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED—
Apr 12, 2006ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Feb 28, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance