USPTO serial 78821249
TAI CHI GREEN TEA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MACFARLANE, JAMES W
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 104 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with TAI CHI GREEN TEA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Vernon Hills, IL
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030 | (Based on Intent to Use) Woolong tea, Black tea ; beverages made of Woolong tea and Black tea; (Based on Use in Commerce) Green tea, beverage made of green tea | ACTIVE | Jul 18, 2005 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 22, 2008 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Dec 16, 2008 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Dec 16, 2008 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Sep 30, 2008 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Aug 19, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 19, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 19, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 13, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 18, 2008 | GNSN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 18, 2008 | GNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 18, 2008 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 20, 2008 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Dec 6, 2007 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 6, 2007 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 6, 2007 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 29, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 12, 2007 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jul 12, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 5, 2007 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jun 5, 2007 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| May 23, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 5, 2007 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 5, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 19, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 15, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 14, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 14, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 30, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 30, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 29, 2006 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 29, 2006 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 29, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 28, 2006 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 28, 2006 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 28, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 22, 2006 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 22, 2006 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 22, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 16, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 16, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 14, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 2, 2006 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Mar 1, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |