USPTO serial 78821253
WEB OBJECTIVE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GAN, REBECCAH
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 103 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with WEB OBJECTIVE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Steven M. Weinberg, Esq.
STEVEN M WEINBERG ESQ & ALL OTHER A GREENBERG TRAURIG LLPTHE WATER GARDEN, 2450 COLORADO AVESANTA MONICA, CA 90404UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer software, including software downloadable from the internet; computer programs for promotional purposes; computer programs for data analysis; encoded data in the form of computer listings; data recorded electronically from the internet | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | Opinion polling; data processing; data analysis; provision of business information; business research services; market research services; business promotion services; advertising services; advisory services and assistance relating to business services; business consultancy services; information technology consultancy services; website optimization services (including for ranking by search engines); preparation and compilation of data lists | ACTIVE | — |
| 038 | Providing user access to the internet; operating of search engines; organization and optimization of internet search engines; organization of websites | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Creating, maintaining and hosting the web sites of others; compilation, creation and maintenance of a register of domain names; website monitoring services; computerized analysis of data | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Connectivityman Limited
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 038
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named WEB OBJECTIVE
- Prosecution event MAB2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 9, 2007 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 8, 2007 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 10, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 10, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 9, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 2, 2006 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Mar 1, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |