Drawing for CRICKET PHONE CARD

USPTO serial 78821430

CRICKET PHONE CARD

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
WATSON, JULIE A
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 109 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CRICKET PHONE CARD?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Luis J. Diaz, Esq.

LUIS J DIAZ ESQ IDT CORPORATION520 MADISON AVENEW YORK, NY 10016UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
036Prepaid telephone calling card and telephone debit card servicesACTIVEMay 24, 2004

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 31, 2007UNDNUNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN—
Dec 13, 2007MAB1ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT—
Dec 13, 2007ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Dec 12, 2007EXARTEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED—
Jul 30, 2007RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jan 29, 2007GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jan 29, 2007CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Jan 27, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jan 26, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 26, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 6, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 26, 2006GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 26, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 25, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 1, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance