CopyMark Law Group
4.9/5
Drawing for PCM

USPTO serial 78822042

PCM

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
AYALA, LOURDES
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with PCM?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Trademark Monitoring
(312) 319-4460
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Start a new application
(312) 319-4460

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Allyn Taylor

ALLYN TAYLOR DLA PIPER LLP (US)2000 UNIVERSITY AVENUEEAST PALO ALTO, CA 94303-2215UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer hardware; integrated chips for use in televisions for color resolution improvement; computer software for improving color resolution in televisions.ACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 19, 2010MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 19, 2010ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 10, 2009EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Dec 10, 2009EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Dec 10, 2009EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Dec 9, 2009ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Dec 2, 2009ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
May 29, 2009EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
May 29, 2009EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
May 29, 2009EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jan 5, 2009EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Jan 5, 2009AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Dec 15, 2008EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Dec 15, 2008EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 17, 2008EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jun 11, 2008EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jun 11, 2008EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Dec 18, 2007NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Sep 25, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 5, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Aug 21, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Aug 17, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jul 3, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 14, 2007GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Mar 14, 2007CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Feb 22, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Feb 21, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 21, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 9, 2006TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Aug 22, 2006GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 22, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 13, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 2, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance