Drawing for ROEX SPARK

USPTO serial 78822281

ROEX SPARK

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
GENOVESE, CARRIE A
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ROEX SPARK?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Lindsay J. Hulley

Adam Michelin OWS PRODUCTS, LLC250 Bell StreetReno, NV 89503UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
005Dietary and nutritional supplements; Food supplements; Herbal supplementsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 13, 2014CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Nov 13, 2014COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Jan 29, 2010TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Nov 3, 2008ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 3, 2008REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jan 9, 2008MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 6, 2007ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 17, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 2, 2007NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Oct 12, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 10, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 20, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Aug 28, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Aug 18, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Aug 11, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 6, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 2, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance