USPTO serial 78822703
USM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BRACEY, KAREN
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with USM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Stuart E. Beck
Stuart E. Beck THE BECK LAW FIRM1500 Walnut StreetSuite 700Philadelphia, PA 19102-3504Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 037 | Snow removal services; heating, ventilation, and air conditioning equipment services; namely, maintenance and repair; janitorial services, namely, cleaning of business premises, restrooms, offices, fixtures, air ducts and vents; carpet services; namely installation, repair, maintenance, shampooing, extracting and bonneting; smoke, fire, flood and water damage services; namely, cleanup; mechanical equipment on business premises services in the nature of electrical, heating, cooling, lighting, and plumbing equipment and installations; namely maintenance and repair; flooring services, namely, repair, restoration, installation, scrubbing, buffing, sanding, screening, re-coating, and burnishing varied floor surfaces, including wood, VCT, and ceramic tile, namely, general repair and maintenance services; namely, carpentry, plumbing, and painting | ACTIVE | — |
| 044 | Landscaping gardening | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by TOWER CLEANING SYSTEMS, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by TOWER CLEANING SYSTEMS, INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 037
- Other trademarks in Class 044
- Similar marks named USM
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 20, 2010 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 20, 2010 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 3, 2010 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 28, 2010 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Jan 28, 2010 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 8, 2009 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 8, 2009 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 22, 2009 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Sep 22, 2009 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Sep 22, 2009 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 21, 2009 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 21, 2009 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 21, 2009 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Feb 18, 2009 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 18, 2009 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Feb 18, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 17, 2008 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 30, 2008 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 30, 2008 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jul 30, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 11, 2008 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| May 9, 2008 | PGEX | PETITION GRANTED - EXTENSION REQUEST FILED | — |
| May 7, 2008 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| May 1, 2008 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| May 1, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 23, 2008 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 23, 2008 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 21, 2008 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Aug 21, 2007 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 29, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 9, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 31, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 28, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 27, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 27, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 20, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 20, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 25, 2006 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 15, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 15, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 15, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 2, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |