USPTO serial 78822920
PLATINUM LABEL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- NELSON, EDWARD
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with PLATINUM LABEL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Stephen L. Baker
Stephen L. Baker Baker and RannellsSuite 102 575 Route 28Raritan, NJ 08869UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Bath foams; Bath gels; Body lotion; Body masks; Body scrub; Body sprays; Cleansing milk; Cologne; Cosmetic preparations for skin renewal; Cosmetics; Deodorant for personal use; Essential oils for personal use; Facial masks; Facial scrubs; Fragrances for personal use; Hair conditioners; Hair shampoo; Hair spray; Hair waving lotion; Incense; Liquid bath soaps; Liquid soap used in foot bath; Perfume; Room fragrances; Shaving foam; Shaving gel; Shower gel; Skin cleansers; Skin moisturizer; Skin toners; Sun screen preparations; Toilet soap; Toilet water | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 15, 2008 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Feb 15, 2008 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Feb 14, 2008 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 1, 2007 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 9, 2007 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 13, 2007 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 10, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 21, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 22, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 22, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 22, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 12, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 22, 2006 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 21, 2006 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 21, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 18, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 18, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 15, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 2, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |