USPTO serial 78823619
APOLLO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SETTLES LEWIS, SHAILA E
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 114 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with APOLLO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Mark C. Gregory
MARK C GREGORY MARK C GREGORY102 DICKINSON LNWILMINGTON, DE 19807UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 008 | Hand tools, namely, wrenches, pliers, socket sets, hex keys wrenches,screwdrivers, bits for hand drills, hammers and mallets, pliers and bolt cutters, glass cutters, wire cutters, clamps and metal vises, multi-function tools comprised of screwdrivers, pliers, knives, files, can openers, scissors, files; saws and blades for hand saws, adjustable wrenches, multi-function wrenches, socket sets, socket accessories, namely, socket extensions; utility knives, tool kits comprised of pliers sets, screwdriver sets, wrench sets, utility knife sets, nut driver sets, bit drivers, hose clamps, pry bars, multi-function hand tools comprised of screwdrivers, knives, pliers, files and can openers, wire strippers, extension rods, namely drill extension rods for hand drills, ratcheting wrenches, crimping tools, namely crimping irons, ratchet drivers, locking wrenches, utility knives, nut drivers, screwdrivers, and ratchet bit drivers | ACTIVE | Nov 24, 2002 |
| 009 | Tape measures and tape rulers; Carpenter's levels; Voltage testers; Electrical testers; Electrical cable installation accessories, namely cable ties | ACTIVE | Nov 24, 2002 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 9, 2009 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 8, 2009 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 8, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 6, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 24, 2008 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Mar 24, 2008 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 21, 2008 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 20, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 14, 2007 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Sep 14, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 13, 2007 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 13, 2007 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 22, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 21, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 21, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 22, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 21, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 15, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 3, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |