USPTO serial 78824765
PREP EXPERT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CHISOLM, KEVON
- Law office
- DIVISIONAL UNIT
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with PREP EXPERT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
David W. Grace
David W. Grace LOEB & LOEB LLP10100 Santa Monica BoulevardSuite 2200LOS ANGELES, CA 90067-4120Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | ELECTRIC KITCHEN APPARATUS AND MACHINES FOR CHOPPING, GRATING, CRUSHING, GRINDING, SQUEEZING, CUTTING, MIXING, EMULSIFYING, WHIPPING OR PEELING FOODS PRODUCTS, NAMELY, WHIPPERS, MIXERS, CITRUS FRUIT SQUEEZERS, ALIMENTARY JUICE EXTRACTORS, MINI CHOPPERS, MEAT CHOPPERS, FOOD PROCESSORS, ELECTRIC SLICERS, ELECTRIC KNIVES, ELECTRIC COFFEE MILLS, ELECTRIC CAN OPENERS; ELECTRIC KITCHEN APPARATUS AND MACHINES FOR CHOPPING, GRATING, CRUSHING, GRINDING, SQUEEZING, CUTTING, MIXING, EMULSIFYING, WHIPPING OR PEELING FOODS PRODUCTS IN PARTICULAR, WHIPPERS, MIXERS, CITRUS-FRUIT SQUEEZERS, ALIMENTARY JUICE EXTRACTORS, MINI CHOPPERS, MEAT-CHOPPERS, FOOD PROCESSORS, ELECTRIC SLICERS, ELECTRIC KNIVES, ELECTRIC COFFEE MILLS, ELECTRIC CAN OPENERS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 17, 2010 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 17, 2010 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 29, 2009 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 29, 2009 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Jul 29, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 26, 2009 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 26, 2009 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jan 26, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 2, 2008 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 2, 2008 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jul 2, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 26, 2008 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 26, 2008 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Mar 26, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 26, 2007 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 26, 2007 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Sep 26, 2007 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 22, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 17, 2007 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 17, 2007 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Aug 17, 2007 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 17, 2007 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jan 23, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 3, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 5, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 29, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 29, 2006 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 29, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Nov 28, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 28, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 12, 2006 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 11, 2006 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 3, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 2, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 2, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 22, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 21, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 21, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 15, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 6, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |