Drawing for WOLFF

USPTO serial 78825005

WOLFF

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
LORENZO, GEORGE M
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 101 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with WOLFF?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jonathan H. Spadt

REX A DONNELLY RATNERPRESTIAPO BOX 15961007 ORANGE ST STE 1100WILMINGTON, DE 19899

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
013Firearm parts, namely springs, magazines and guide rodsACTIVEJan 1, 1972

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 30, 2008MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Apr 23, 2008ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Apr 23, 2008EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Mar 8, 2008EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
Dec 12, 2007GEA1NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Dec 12, 2007GECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Dec 12, 2007CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED—
Nov 8, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Nov 8, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 5, 2007ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Nov 5, 2007EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Nov 5, 2007JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Nov 5, 2007EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
May 4, 2007GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 4, 2007CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 29, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 29, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 29, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Feb 21, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 21, 2006GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 21, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 17, 2006TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Aug 17, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 20, 2006MDSCNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED—
Mar 6, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance