USPTO serial 78825029
MECREV BY ADLER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CARRUTHERS, SUE
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 108 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with MECREV BY ADLER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Rovereto (TN), IT
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Duane M. Byers
DUANE M BYERS NIXON & VANDERHYE PC901 N GLEBE RD STE 1100ARLINGTON, VA 22203-1808UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Motors and engines not for land vehicles, machine coupling and transmission parts not for land vehicles; parts and elements of machines not for land vehicles, namely oil filters and air filters for motors and engines, air filters for mechanical purposes, air turbines, band brakes, brake discs, carburettors, exhaust manifolds for motors and engines, coils, rotors, oil filters for motors and engines, oil tanks, oil tank plugs and caps, clutch discs, centrifugal clutches, clutch drums, rubber metal dampers; transmission belts not for land vehicles and parts thereof, namely chain sprockets, chain crowns and wheel rubber compensators; cogwheels for gears, gear cutters (tool machine), and differential gears, reduction gears all for industrial machinery, manufacturing industry machines, namely, wood-manufacturing machines, manufacturing machines for agriculture, manufacturing machines for the automotive industry, packing machines, loading and unloading machinery for industry. | ACTIVE | — |
| 012 | Vehicles, namely land motor vehicles and apparatus in the nature of motorcycles, super-bikes, mopeds, motorbikes, motorcycles for motocross, motorized scooters, snowmobiles, ATV (all-terrain vehicles), minicars, motor vehicles for use in the agriculture; parts of all the aforesaid land motor vehicles, namely, brake cables, brake pads, brake discs, clutch discs, centrifugal clutches, clutch drums, rubber metal dampers, clutch cables, fork bearings and races, fork dust boots, fork seals, handle bars, handle bar control levers, handle bar dampers, handle bar grip, brake callipers, brake pedals, brake rotors, front spacers, front dash panels, shift levers, headlight mounts, handle bar throttles, air turbines, rotors, tire locks; cogwheels for gears, for motor land vehicles, motors and engines for land vehicles; coupling and transmission components for land vehicles, namely speed gears, continuous variable belt power transmissions; transmission mechanisms for land vehicles, transmission belts for land vehicles; reduction gears, input and output shafts, gear drives, gear boxes; differential gears. | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 10, 2008 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 10, 2008 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 13, 2008 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 13, 2008 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 13, 2008 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 22, 2008 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jul 20, 2007 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 20, 2007 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 20, 2007 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 29, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 29, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 29, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 19, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 19, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 22, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 22, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 11, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 15, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 4, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 18, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 18, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 15, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 6, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |