USPTO serial 78825939
TECHMERVISION
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CROWLEY, SEAN MICHAEL
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with TECHMERVISION?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Rancho Dominguez, CA
Rancho Dominguez, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
MATTHEW R. MOWERS
MATTHEW R. MOWERS BROOKS KUSHMAN P.C.1000 Town Center, 22nd FloorSOUTHFIELD, MI 48075-1238UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer software platforms for color measurement and identification, color communication, color management, color quality control, color formulation, color visualization, and reduce metameric differences and increase color harmony among different materials to appear as the same color under various lighting sources comprised of color measuring computer software and an electronic color database recorded on computer media, the software is used to correct batches during the formulation and manufacture of these colored products, and reduce metameric differences and increase color harmony among different materials to appear as the same color under various lighting sources; mobile computing and operating platforms consisting of color measuring computer software, an electronic color database recorded on computer media and color measuring apparatuses namely colorimeters and spectrophotometers for collection and management of data, namely color measurement and identification, color communication, color management, color quality control, color formulation, color visualization, and reduce metameric differences and increase color harmony among different materials to appear as the same color under various lighting sources, the software is used to correct batches during the formulation and manufacture of these colored products, and reduce metameric differences and increase color harmony among different materials to appear as the same color under various lighting sources; color matching and formulation systems comprising color matching computer software and an electronic color database recorded on computer media for use in plastic color matching, ordering and measuring color for quality control, and reducing metameric differences and increasing color harmony among different materials to appear as the same color under various lighting sources, the software is used to correct batches during the formulation and manufacture of these colored products, and reduce metameric differences and increase color harmony among different materials to appear as the same color under various lighting sources; color matching software and electronic color database recorded on computer media for, in conjunction with at least one computer and color measuring devices, calculating required individual amounts of pre-colored material needed to simulate a color standard or to produce or develop a specific color in industries that use such pre-colored materials or pigments such as the plastics industry, the software is used to correct batches during the formulation and manufacture of these colored products, and reduce metameric differences and increase color harmony among different materials to appear as the same color under various lighting sources; electronic database in the field of color matching in the plastics industry recorded on computer media, namely an electronic database recorded on computer media that is used to correct batches during the formulation and manufacture of these colored products, and reduce metameric differences and increase color harmony among different materials to appear as the same color under various lighting sources | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | Database management | ACTIVE | — |
| 040 | Providing information in the field of custom plastics manufacturing, namely providing informational databases for the plastics manufacturing industry featuring information concerning plastics color pallet of various colorants and concentrations thereof in various plastics for the selection and use of colorants in the field of making plastic articles via extrusion or molding operations; providing a world wide plastics color pallet from a centralized database, namely providing a computer database in the plastics manufacturing industry featuring information concerning color measurement and identification, color communication, color management, color quality control, color formulation, color visualization, and reduction of metameric differences and increase color harmony among different plastic-based materials to appear as the same color under various lighting sources | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Technical consultation in the field of the selection and use of colorants or additives for improving processing or performance of polymers in the field of making plastic articles via extrusion or molding operations, namely technical consultation in the technology field of the scientific color technology used in plastics manufacturing; rental of a database server to third parties with a resident database | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Techmer PM, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by Techmer PM, LLC
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 040
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named TECHMERVISION
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 6, 2009 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 6, 2009 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 4, 2008 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 4, 2008 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Dec 4, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 28, 2008 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| May 28, 2008 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| May 28, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 5, 2007 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 5, 2007 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Dec 5, 2007 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 5, 2007 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 13, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 21, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 30, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 29, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 29, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jan 26, 2007 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 26, 2007 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 26, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 22, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 22, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 11, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 16, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 8, 2006 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 8, 2006 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| May 19, 2006 | GPRA | PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| May 19, 2006 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION WRITTEN | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| May 18, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 7, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |