USPTO serial 78826162
BLACKLINE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HELLMAN, ELI J
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with BLACKLINE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
ANN ARBOR, MI
ANN ARBOR, MI
ANN ARBOR, MI
Ann Arbor, MI
Ann Arbor, MI
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Lori A. Burke, Linda A. Heban, Jennifer K. Ziegler, M. Blair Gerdes, Dorne McKinnon-Rybicki
LORI A. BURKE H-D MICHIGAN, INC.315 W HURON ST STE 400ANN ARBOR, MI 48103-3372UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | Outerclothing, namely jackets and coats; sweaters, suspenders, scarves, bandannas, jackets, coats, vests, gloves, jeans, chaps, shirts, jerseys, shorts, caps, hats, headwear, knit hats, rain hats, belts, wristbands, coveralls, hosiery, halter tops, neckties, nightgowns, night shirts, pajamas, pants, rain suits, rain coats, sweatshirts, sweat pants, tank tops, T-shirts, underwear, suits, head bands, leg warmers, aprons, mittens, lingerie, leather clothing, namely leather coats, leather jackets, leather pants, leather chaps, leather vests; swimsuits, skirts, bib overalls, cloth bibs, footwear, namely shoes and boots, and parts of footwear, namely boot tips, sole plates, heel guards | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by H-D MICHIGAN, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by H-D MICHIGAN, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by H-D MICHIGAN, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by H-D Michigan, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by H-D Michigan, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 025
- Similar marks named BLACKLINE
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 14, 2009 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 14, 2009 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 16, 2009 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Sep 9, 2009 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Apr 9, 2009 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 9, 2009 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Mar 26, 2009 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Mar 26, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Feb 25, 2009 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Sep 16, 2008 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 16, 2008 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 11, 2008 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Sep 11, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 17, 2008 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 3, 2008 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Apr 3, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Nov 13, 2007 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 21, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 1, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 15, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 11, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 11, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 11, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 9, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 6, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 6, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 6, 2007 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Feb 6, 2007 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 26, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 26, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 24, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 7, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |