Drawing for AMERICAN ETHANOL

USPTO serial 78826212

AMERICAN ETHANOL

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CARL III, FRED
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 108 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with AMERICAN ETHANOL?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Sheldon R. Meyer

SHELDON R. MEYER FLIESLER MEYER LLP650 CALIFORNIA STREET14TH FLOORSAN FRANCISCO, CA 94108

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
001Chemical additives for fuel treatment, namely, ethanol sold to commercial wholesalers and fuel blenders of ethanol fuels; carbon dioxide filled cylinders sold to commercial wholesalersACTIVE—
004Fuels, namely, ethanol sold to commercial wholesalers and fuel blenders of ethanol fuelsACTIVE—
030Processed distiller's grain sold to commercial wholesalersACTIVE—
033Distilled spirits sold to commercial wholesalersACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 18, 2009MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Oct 27, 2009ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Oct 26, 2009EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Sep 8, 2009EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
Jun 2, 2009GEA1NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Jun 2, 2009GECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Jun 2, 2009CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED—
May 11, 2009EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
May 11, 2009JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
May 11, 2009EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
May 7, 2009ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
May 6, 2009TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 6, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 6, 2009ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Nov 12, 2008GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Nov 12, 2008GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Nov 12, 2008CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Oct 8, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 8, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 8, 2008TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 22, 2008GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 22, 2008GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 22, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 2, 2008RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Dec 12, 2007ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Oct 2, 2007RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Apr 2, 2007GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Apr 2, 2007CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Mar 22, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 22, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 22, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Feb 15, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 28, 2006TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Aug 16, 2006GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 16, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 9, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 7, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance