USPTO serial 78826451
ESTABLISHED 1845 MARK CROSS TRADE MARK
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HWANG, JOHN C B
- Law office
- PETITIONS OFFICE
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ESTABLISHED 1845 MARK CROSS TRADE MARK?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Arthur J. DeBaugh
ARTHUR J DEBAUGH MOORE & VAN ALLEN PLLC430 DAVIS DR STE 500MORRISVILLE, NC 27560-6802UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | Ties, ascots, scarves, socks, hosiery, pantyhose, knee-high stockings, stockings, tights, leg warmers, leggings, leotards, lingerie, panties, brassieres, camisoles, slips, shoes, sneakers, boots, footwear, athletic shoes, golf shoes, slippers, sandals, jackets, ski wear, parkas, pants, gloves, mittens, belts, money belts, head wear, hats, caps, swim wear, surf wear, swim caps, swim trunks, tennis wear, blouses, shirts, T-shirts, undershirts, dress shirts, knit shirts, golf shirts, polo shirts, short-sleeved shirts, sport shirts, wind shirts, wind coats, wind resistant jackets, wind vests, wind-jackets, smoking jackets, dresses, robes, sleepwear, pajamas, night shirts, night gowns, negligees, jeans, jumpers, sweaters, mufflers, shorts, skorts, skirts, sweat pants, sweat shirts, slacks, vests, coats, underwear, briefs, boxer shorts, boxer briefs, cardigans, sports jackets, suits, fur cloaks, ponchos, overcoats, rain coats, suspenders | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 20, 2011 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE | — |
| Apr 18, 2011 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 16, 2011 | MAB1 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT | — |
| Feb 16, 2011 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Feb 15, 2011 | EXAR | TEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 21, 2010 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Apr 12, 2010 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Apr 12, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 8, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 12, 2009 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Apr 11, 2009 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Oct 11, 2008 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Oct 11, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 11, 2008 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Feb 14, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 11, 2007 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 11, 2007 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 11, 2007 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 13, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 11, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 11, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 11, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 11, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 24, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 22, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 22, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 22, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 22, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 18, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 8, 2006 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Mar 7, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |