Where is the live CopyMark page for USPTO serial 78826480?

The live record is at https://getcopymark.com/trademark/78826480. Use https://getcopymark.com/trademark/{serialNumber} for any 8-digit USPTO serial.

Who owns PERFECTARBOR?

According to the public USPTO record for serial number 78826480, the listed owner(s) include: Rollomatic Inc..

What is USPTO serial number 78826480?

Serial number 78826480 is the USPTO application identifier for the mark PERFECTARBOR. It is used to track examination, publication, and registration of this trademark.

Which trademark classes cover PERFECTARBOR?

The public record lists International Classes: 007. Each class corresponds to categories of goods or services identified in the application or registration.

4.9/5

USPTO serial 78826480

PERFECTARBOR

Q: What is the current status of PERFECTARBOR?

PERFECTARBOR (78826480) currently shows USPTO status code 614 on the public record. This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 614

Filing date: Mar 1, 2006
Status date: Sep 9, 2008
Registration date: —
Examiner: FINNEGAN, TIMOTHY
Law office: PETITIONS OFFICE

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with PERFECTARBOR?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner

Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.

Trademark Monitoring

(312) 319-4460

Not the owner?

File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Start a new application

(312) 319-4460

Owner

Rollomatic Inc.
Mundelein, IL
Other trademarks owned by Rollomatic Inc.

Goods and services

Class	Description	Status	First use
007	Arbor System composed of a wheel hub that holds an abrasive wheel for the purpose of mounting to a grinding spindle, for cylindrical grinding machine.	ACTIVE	Jan 1, 2006

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Date	Code	Event	What it means
Sep 9, 2008	PETD	PETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED	—
Jun 11, 2008	PINM	INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED	—
Mar 14, 2008	APET	ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF	—
Mar 7, 2008	PETR	PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED	—
Mar 7, 2008	MAIL	PAPER RECEIVED	—
Feb 11, 2008	MAB2	ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND	The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Feb 11, 2008	ABN2	ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE	The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jul 14, 2007	GNFN	NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED	—
Jul 14, 2007	GNFR	FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED	A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 14, 2007	CNFR	FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN	A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 15, 2007	TEME	TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED	—
Jun 15, 2007	CRFA	CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE	—
Jun 15, 2007	TROA	TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED	This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 9, 2007	GNRT	NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED	A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 9, 2007	CNRT	NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN	A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 24, 2007	TEME	TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED	—
Mar 23, 2007	CRFA	CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE	—
Mar 23, 2007	TROA	TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED	This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 2, 2007	GNRT	NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED	A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 2, 2007	CNRT	NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN	A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 9, 2007	TEME	TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED	—
Feb 9, 2007	CRFA	CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE	—
Feb 9, 2007	ALIE	ASSIGNED TO LIE	—
Jan 16, 2007	TROA	TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED	This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 21, 2006	GNRT	NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED	A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 21, 2006	CNRT	NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN	A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 18, 2006	DOCK	ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER	—
Mar 7, 2006	NWAP	NEW APPLICATION ENTERED	—