USPTO serial 78827415
PRISM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3889194Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Dec 14, 2010
- Examiner
- HAN, DAWN L
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with PRISM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
William M. Lee, Jr.
WILLIAM M LEE JR BARNES & THORNBURG LLPPO BOX 2786CHICAGO, IL 60690-2786UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | RADAR APPARATUS AND INSTRUMENTS, NAMELY, PORTABLE RADAR TRANSMITTERS; PORTABLE RADAR RECEIVERS; PORTABLE RADAR TRANSCEIVERS; PORTABLE RADAR TRANSCEIVERS FOR NON-INVASIVE SURVEILLANCE; HAND-HELD RADAR TRANSCEIVERS FOR THROUGH-WALL INVESTIGATION OF INTERIOR SPACES; ANTENNAE FOR USE WITH THE FOREGOING APPARATUS AND INSTRUMENTS; COMPUTER SOFTWARE, NAMELY, OPERATING PROGRAMS FOR THE FOREGOING APPARATUS AND INSTRUMENTS | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 042 | SCIENTIFIC AND TECHNOLOGICAL SERVICES, NAMELY, SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH AND DESIGN FOR OTHERS IN THE FIELD OF RADAR APPARATUS AND INSTRUMENTS; DESIGN AND DEVELOPMENT OF NEW TECHNOLOGY FOR OTHERS IN THE FIELD OF ELECTRONICS FOR INCORPORATION IN OR USE WITH RADAR APPARATUS AND INSTRUMENTS; DESIGN AND DEVELOPMENT OF NEW TECHNOLOGY FOR OTHERS IN THE FIELD OF COMPUTER SOFTWARE FOR RADAR APPARATUS AND INSTRUMENTS | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Cambridge Consultants Limited
- Other trademarks owned by Cambridge Consultants Limited
- Other trademarks owned by Cambridge Consultants Limited
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named PRISM
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 21, 2017 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Dec 14, 2010 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Nov 8, 2010 | DP1B | 1(B) BASIS DELETED; PROCEED TO REGISTRATION | — |
| Nov 8, 2010 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Oct 22, 2010 | IUCN | NOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED | — |
| Oct 22, 2010 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 5, 2010 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 10, 2010 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 10, 2010 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 6, 2010 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 1, 2010 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 2, 2010 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 2, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 2, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 19, 2010 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 7, 2010 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 7, 2010 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 7, 2010 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 16, 2009 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 16, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 14, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 12, 2009 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 12, 2009 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 12, 2009 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| May 26, 2009 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Nov 24, 2008 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 24, 2008 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 24, 2008 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 4, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 4, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 30, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 6, 2008 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 6, 2008 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 6, 2008 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 26, 2008 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Mar 26, 2008 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Sep 12, 2007 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Mar 8, 2007 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 8, 2007 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 17, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 17, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 17, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 22, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 15, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 15, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 8, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 8, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |