USPTO serial 78827435
SPHERE COASTER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CLAYTON, CHERYL A
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 110
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SPHERE COASTER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
James A. Mitchell
JAMES A MITCHELL PRICE, HENEVELD, COOPER, DEWITT ETAL LLPPO BOX 2567GRAND RAPIDS, MI 49501-2567UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 006 | TRANSPORTABLE BUILDING WALL FRAMING MATERIAL MADE PRIMARILY OF METAL, METALLIC MATERIALS FOR RAILWAY TRACKS | ACTIVE | — |
| 012 | VEHICLES, PLEASURE VEHICLES, AND APPARATUS FOR LOCOMOTION BY LAND, AIR OR WATER, NAMELY, RAIL BOUND VEHICLES, RAIL VEHICLES, PASSENGER CARRIAGES, RAILWAY PASSENGER CARS, CABLE CARS AND BOATS | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | GAMES AND PLAYTHINGS, NAMELY, BOARD GAMES, CARD GAMES, AMUSEMENT GAME MACHINES, COIN-OPERATED AMUSEMENT MACHINES, COIN-OPERATED VIDEO GAMES; GYMNASTIC APPARATUS; SPORTING ARTICLES AND SPORTS EQUIPMENT, NAMELY, EXERCISE MACHINES, EXERCISE TRAMPOLINES, SLEDS, CLIMBERS' HARNESSES AND ARTIFICIAL CLIMBING WALLS; AMUSEMENT PARK RIDES, NAMELY, MERRY-GO-ROUNDS, ROLLER COASTERS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 29, 2011 | MAB1 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT | — |
| Apr 29, 2011 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Apr 28, 2011 | EXAR | TEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 30, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 30, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 15, 2011 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 16, 2010 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 16, 2010 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 27, 2010 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Aug 26, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 24, 2010 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Feb 24, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 24, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 28, 2010 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 29, 2009 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 28, 2009 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 6, 2009 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 5, 2009 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 15, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 15, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 15, 2008 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 23, 2008 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 23, 2008 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| May 21, 2008 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Nov 20, 2007 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Nov 20, 2007 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Oct 26, 2007 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Apr 26, 2007 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 25, 2007 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 31, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 31, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 31, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 26, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 21, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 19, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 19, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 8, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |