USPTO serial 78827705
SLIME
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- RADEMACHER, MARK A
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SLIME?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Peter D. Murray, Esq.
Peter D. Murray, Esq. Cooper & Dunham LLP30 Rockefeller PlazaNew York, NY 10112UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | SKIN LOTION, SKIN CREAM, FACIAL CLEANSER, FACIAL TREATMENTS, NAMELY, MOISTURIZERS, MASKS, TONERS, GELS, SCRUBS, EXFOLIANTS FOR EYE, PRE-MOISTENED COSMETIC WIPES; ANTI-AGING TREATMENTS, NAMELY, ANTI-AGING, ANTI-WRINKLE AND NON-MEDICATED SCAR TREATMENT GELS, CREAMS AND LOTIONS; SUNBLOCK, SUN PROTECTION CREAMS, SUNSCREEN, NON-MEDICATED ACNE TREATMENTS, NAMELY, CLEANSERS, MASKS, SOAPS, TONERS, ASTRINGENTS, MOISTURIZERS; EYE CREAMS AND EYE LOTIONS; MEN'S FACIAL TREATMENT, NAMELY, SKIN LOTION, SKIN CREAM, FACIAL CLEANSER, FACIAL TREATMENTS, NAMELY, MOISTURIZERS, MASKS, TONERS, GELS, SCRUBS, EXFOLIANTS FOR EYE; FACIAL AND BODY EMULSIONS, COSMETIC FACIAL MUD PACKS, FACIAL OILS, FACIAL BRONZER; FACIAL CREAMS AND CLEANSERS; PORE CLARIFYING TREATMENT, NAMELY, NON-MEDICATED PORE CLARIFYING MASK, PORE CLEANSING STRIPS, MASKS, SCRUBS AND TONER ASTRINGENT; COSMETIC AGE-RETARDANT CREAMS, LOTIONS AND GELS; COSMETIC EYELASH TREATMENTS AND CONDITIONERS; MAKE-UP REMOVING PREPARATIONS; BATH SOAP, MOISTURIZING BODY WASH, BATH FOAMS, BATH GELS, BODY LOTIONS AND MOISTURIZERS, BEAUTY GELS, TALC POWDERS, MEN'S BODY CARE, NAMELY, BATH SOAP, MOISTURIZING BODY WASH, BATH FOAMS, BATH GELS, BODY LOTIONS AND MOISTURIZERS; HAND CREAMS, NON-MEDICATED FOOT CREAMS, PERFUMES; EAU DE COLOGNE; TOILET WATER; ESSENTIAL OILS FOR PERSONAL USE; TALCUM POWDERS; NAIL CARE PREPARATIONS, NAIL VARNISH FOR COSMETIC PURPOSES; BATH OILS, MASSAGE OILS, FACE AND BODY POWDERS; BATH AND SHOWER PREPARATIONS, NAMELY, BATH AND SHOWER GEL, MOISTURIZING BODY WASH, BODY MIST, BODY POWDERS, BODY SPLASH AND DRY OIL SPRAY FOR THE BODY, DEODORANTS FOR USE ON THE PERSON; LIP MOISTURIZERS, NON-MEDICATED LIP BALMS; NON-MEDICATED MOISTURIZING LOTIONS, GELS AND BALMS FOR THE FEET; NON-MEDICATED PROTECTIVE AND MOISTURIZING SKIN OINTMENTS; FOUNDATION, FACIAL POWDER, EYESHADOW, MASCARA, BLUSH, CONCEALER, EYE LINER, NAIL ENAMEL, LIPSTICK, EYEBROW PENCIL, EYEBROW GEL, LIP LINER, MOISTURIZING SKIN CREAMS AND LOTIONS, MAKE-UP PRODUCTS IN THE NATURE OF COSMETICS FOR THE FACE AND BODY, COSMETIC SUN TANNING PREPARATIONS, SUNBLOCKS, SUNSCREENS, COSMETIC SUN PROTECTION LOTIONS; MASCARA, FACE POWDER, ADHESIVES FOR COSMETIC USE, BLEACHING PREPARATIONS FOR COSMETIC PURPOSES; SUNLESS TANNING SPRAYS, CREAMS AND LOTION FOR THE BODY AND FACE; ANTIPERSPIRANT; TANNING SPRAYS, CREAMS AND LOTION FOR THE BODY AND FACE, FACIAL BRONZER; HENNA FOR COSMETIC PURPOSES | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 26, 2009 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 26, 2009 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 8, 2009 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 6, 2009 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 6, 2009 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Mar 23, 2009 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Mar 23, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 23, 2008 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 1, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 11, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 27, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 23, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 6, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 6, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 6, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 7, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 6, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 16, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 16, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 16, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 16, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 13, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 13, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 16, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 16, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 16, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 14, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 16, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 16, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 12, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 8, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |