USPTO serial 78827836
BAJA CONCEPT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- WILKE, JOHN
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with BAJA CONCEPT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Karen D. Convery
KAREN D CONVERY AMERICAN PATENT & TRADEMARK LAW CTR12702 VIA CORTINA STE 100DEL MAR, CA 92014-3769UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Perfume; eau de cologne; eau de perfume; eau de toilette; shower gel; body lotion; skin soaps; personal deodorants and antiperspirants; aftershave lotion; hair lotions; essential oils for personal use and body powder; suntanning preparations; sunscreen preparations; after sun lotions; self-tanning preparations | ACTIVE | — |
| 009 | Eyeglasses; sunglasses; sport goggles for use in swimming, skiing, snowboarding, bicycling, motorcycling and parachuting; eyeglass frames; eyeglass cases; eyeglass chains, straps and chords; replacement lenses and parts therefor | ACTIVE | — |
| 014 | Jewelry; watches; clocks | ACTIVE | — |
| 018 | Coin purses; tote bags; sports bags; backpacks; sling bags; beach bags; duffel bags; dance bags; handbags; soft-sided all-purpose bags; cosmetic bags; briefcases; briefcase type portfolios; catalog cases; messenger document bags; all-purpose carrying bags made from plush fabric; roll bags; wallets; luggage namely, suitcases with and without wheels; umbrellas | ACTIVE | — |
| 025 | Clothing for men, women and children, namely, warm up suits, jogging suits, sweat suits, sweat pants and sweat shirts, body suits, leotards, leg warmers, wet suits, ski suits, ski pants, ski bibs, ski jackets, swim wear, bathing suits, beach and bathing cover ups, suits, tuxedos, slacks, trousers, pants jeans, shorts, sweat shorts, gym shorts, tops, jackets, coats, sport coats, shirts, sport shirts, t-shirts, knit shirts, polo shirts, pullovers, sweaters, vests, tank tops, blazers, jump suits, play suits, overcoats, parkas, wind resistant jackets, leather jackets, footwear, shoes, boots, slippers, athletic footwear, basketball shoes, casual footwear, sandals, flip flops, head wear, hats, caps, visors, hoods, berets, headbands, sweat bands, wristbands, ear muffs, neckwear, neckties, neckerchieves, scarves, bandannas, sleep wear, robes pajamas, nightshirts, gowns, children's sleep wear and loungewear consisting of long and short two-piece sets, cloth bibs, rain wear, gloves, mittens, galoshes, lounge wear, underwear, briefs, underpants, boxer shorts, undershirts, suspenders, hosiery, socks, belts, belt bags, masquerade and Halloween costumes, and aprons | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Harms, Donn K.
- Other trademarks owned by Harms, Donn K.
- Other trademarks in Class 003
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 014
- Other trademarks in Class 018
- Other trademarks in Class 025
- Similar marks named BAJA CONCEPT
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 17, 2008 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 17, 2008 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 13, 2007 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 21, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 1, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 17, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| May 16, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 16, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 16, 2007 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| May 16, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| May 15, 2007 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| May 11, 2007 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Apr 4, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 4, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 27, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 27, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 27, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 20, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 21, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 19, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 19, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 8, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |