USPTO serial 78827837
KIDS LINE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jan 1, 2008
- Examiner
- BAKER, JORDAN A
- Law office
- —
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with KIDS LINE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
South Gate, CA
South Gate, CA
Los Angeles, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Scott R. Miller
Scott R. Miller Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP333 South Hope Street43rd FloorLos Angeles, CA 90071Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 011 | Lighting devices and accessories, namely, lamps, lamp bases, lamp shades, and electric nightlights | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Dec 31, 1987 |
| 020 | Infant and children's bedding and accessories, namely, textile headrests, pillows, diaper stackers, hampers, picture frames [, and chair pads ] | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Dec 31, 1987 |
| 021 | [ Baskets of wicker, straw, wood and cloth ] | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Dec 31, 1987 |
| 024 | Infant and children's bedding and accessories, namely, blankets, comforters, quilts, fabric valences, drapes, dust ruffles, sheets, textile wall hangings; bassinet bedding, namely, [ bassinet canopies, ] bassinet fitted sheets, bassinet skirts, crib [ and cradle ] canopies; crib bedding sets, namely, comforters, quilts, valences, drapes, dust ruffles, sheets, bumpers; full bedding sets, namely, comforters, quilts, valences, drapes, dust ruffles, sheets, pillow shams; cradle bedding sets, namely, comforters, quilts, bumpers, sheets; bath towels, hooded towels, and face cloths for washing | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Dec 31, 1987 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Kids Line, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by Kids Line, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by Kids Line, LLC
- Other trademarks in Class 011
- Other trademarks in Class 020
- Other trademarks in Class 021
- Other trademarks in Class 024
- Similar marks named KIDS LINE
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 3, 2018 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Jan 1, 2017 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 7, 2015 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 7, 2015 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 16, 2014 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 16, 2014 | C15P | REGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Jul 15, 2014 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jun 30, 2014 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 16, 2012 | COC. | CORRECTION UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| Oct 16, 2012 | AMD7 | SEC 7 REQUEST FILED | — |
| Sep 19, 2012 | EROP | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION-POST REG RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 12, 2012 | PRAM | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 7 | — |
| Sep 9, 2012 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 6, 2012 | ES7R | TEAS SECTION 7 REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 17, 2011 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Dec 9, 2010 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Apr 2, 2008 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Mar 5, 2008 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Jan 1, 2008 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Oct 16, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 26, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 11, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 11, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 7, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Sep 7, 2007 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 7, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 5, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 5, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 29, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 28, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 28, 2007 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Aug 28, 2007 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 28, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 27, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 27, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 26, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 26, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 26, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 23, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 23, 2007 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Feb 23, 2007 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 21, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 19, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 19, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 7, 2006 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Mar 8, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |