USPTO serial 78827852
BASS PRO SHOPS NEXT GENERATION
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3596651Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Mar 24, 2009
- Examiner
- BECK, LORETTA
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 117
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with BASS PRO SHOPS NEXT GENERATION?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
BASS PRO INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY, L.L.C
SPRINGFIELD, MO
Other trademarks owned by BASS PRO INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY, L.L.C
BASS PRO INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY, L.L.C
SPRINGFIELD, MO
Other trademarks owned by BASS PRO INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY, L.L.C
Springfield, MO
Springfield, MO
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Richard L. Kirkpatrick
Richard L. Kirkpatrick Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLPP.O. Box 2824Calendar/Docketing DepartmentSan Francisco, CA 94126-2824Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | Apparel, namely, [ shirts, ] T-shirts [, sweatshirts, jackets and headwear] | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Dec 31, 2008 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by BASS PRO INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY, L.L.C
- Other trademarks owned by BASS PRO INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY, L.L.C
- Other trademarks owned by Bass Pro Trademarks, L.L.C.
- Other trademarks owned by Bass Pro Trademarks, L.L.C.
- Other trademarks in Class 025
- Similar marks named BASS PRO SHOPS NEXT GENERATION
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 25, 2019 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Nov 7, 2018 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Mar 24, 2018 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 8, 2017 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Oct 4, 2017 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Mar 23, 2015 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 23, 2015 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Mar 23, 2015 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Mar 10, 2015 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 9, 2012 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 9, 2012 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 7, 2011 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Jul 7, 2010 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Mar 24, 2009 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Feb 18, 2009 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 18, 2009 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Feb 11, 2009 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Feb 9, 2009 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Feb 9, 2009 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Nov 6, 2008 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 5, 2008 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Nov 4, 2008 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Nov 4, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 28, 2008 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| May 13, 2008 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 28, 2008 | ETOP | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED | — |
| Mar 13, 2008 | CHPB | POST PUBLICATION AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| Feb 12, 2008 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Feb 7, 2008 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 13, 2007 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 13, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 24, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 9, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 5, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 4, 2007 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 4, 2007 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 4, 2007 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 4, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 18, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 5, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 4, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 4, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 2, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 22, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 22, 2007 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 22, 2007 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 26, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 26, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 26, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 19, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 19, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 19, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 19, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 8, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |