USPTO serial 78828264
VESTEK
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- DEFORD, JEFFREY S
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 115 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with VESTEK?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | ANKLETS,SOCKS,APRONS, ATHLETIC FOOTWEAR,ATHLETIC SHOES, ATHLETIC UNIFORMS, BALLOON PANTS, BASEBALL CAPS, BATH SLIPPERS, BATHING SUITS, BATHING TRUNKS, BATHROBES, BEACH COVER-UPS, BEACH SHOES, BEACHWEAR, BED JACKETS, CLOTHING BELTS, BERMUDA SHORTS,BIKINIS, BLAZERS, BLOOMERS, BLOUSES, BLOUSONS, BODY SUITS, BOLEROS, BONNETS, BOOTS, BOTTOMS, BRAS, CLOTHING CAPS, CARDIGANS, CHEMISES, CHEMISETTES, CLOGS, COATS, COMBINATIONS, CORSELETS, CLOTHING CORSETS, FOUNDATION GARMENTS, COSTUMES FOR USE IN ROLE-PLAYING GAMES, COVERALLS, COVER-UPS, CROP TOPS, CULOTTES, DENIM JACKETS, DRESS SHIELDS, DRESSES, DRESSING GOWNS, DUNGAREES, CLOTHING DUSTERS, EVENING GOWNS, FLEECE PULLOVERS, FOOTWEAR, CLOTHING ARTICLES, NAMELY FOULARDS, FOUNDATION GARMENTS, GABERDINES, GLOVES, GOLF SHIRTS, GOWNS, GYM SHORTS, GYM SUITS, HATS, HOUSECOATS, JACKETS, JEANS, CLOTHING JERSEYS, JOGGING SUITS, JUMPERS, JUMPERSUITS, KILTS, KNICKERS, KNIT SHIRTS, LEG WARMER, LEGGINGS, LEOTARDS, LOUNGEWEAR, CLOTHING MANTLES, MINISKIRTS, MOCK TURTLE-NECK SWEATERS, CLOTHING MUFFLERS, MUU MUUS, NIGHT GOWNS, NIGHT SHIRTS, OVERALLS, PAJAMAS, PANTALOONS, PANTIES, PANTS, PANTSUITS, PARKAS, PEDAL PUSHERS, POLO SHIRTS, PULLOVERS, QUILTES VESTS, RAIN JACKETS, ROBES, ROMPERS, SANDALS, SARONGS, SCARVES, CLOTHING SHIFTS, SHIRTS, SHOES, SHORTALLS, SHORTS, SKI WEAR, SKIRTS, SKORTS, SLACKS, SLEEPWEAR, SMOCKS, SNEAKERS, SOCKS, SPORT COATS, SPORT SHIRTS, SUIT COATS, SUITS, SUNSUITS, SWEAT SHIRTS, SWEATERS, SWIM WEAR, TAILLEURS, TANK TOPS, TAP PANTS, TENNIS WEAR, TIGHTS, TOGAS, TROUSERS, TUNICS, TURTLENECKS, T-SHIRTS, UNDERWEAR, UNIFORMS, VESTED SUITS, VESTS, V-NECK SWEATERS, WAISTCOATS, WALKING SHORTS, WARM UP SUITS, WIND SHIRTS, WINDSHIRTS, CLOTHING WRAPS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 9, 2007 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 8, 2007 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 10, 2006 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 10, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 6, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 31, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 31, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 23, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 23, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 22, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 9, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |