USPTO serial 78828848
GOU BU LI
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MALIK, ATTIYA
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 112 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with GOU BU LI?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
City of Industry, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
David J. Habib, Jr.
DAVID J HABIB JR LAW OFFICE OF DAVID J HABIB2835 TOWNSGATE RD STE 102WESTLAKE VILLAGE, CA 91361-3041UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 043 | Restaurant services | ACTIVE | Mar 27, 1993 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 1, 2007 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 1, 2007 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 13, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 13, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 13, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 6, 2006 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 1, 2006 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 1, 2006 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 12, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 19, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 19, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 18, 2006 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 18, 2006 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 7, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 16, 2006 | RSHG | REQUEST FOR SPECIAL HANDLING - GRANTED | — |
| May 12, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 10, 2006 | AMPX | PRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| May 10, 2006 | RFSH | REQUEST FOR SPECIAL HANDLING RECEIVED | — |
| May 10, 2006 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| May 10, 2006 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 28, 2006 | RSHD | REQUEST FOR SPECIAL HANDLING DENIED | — |
| Mar 11, 2006 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Mar 10, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Mar 7, 2006 | RFSH | REQUEST FOR SPECIAL HANDLING RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 7, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 3, 2006 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |