USPTO serial 78829156
WEAR IT... FLIRT IT... FLAUNT IT!
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 614
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HENRY, NAKIA D
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 129 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with WEAR IT... FLIRT IT... FLAUNT IT!?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Michael N. Cohen
Michael N. Cohen Cohen I.P. Law Group, P.C.9025 Wilshire Blvd., Suite 301Beverly Hills, CA 90211UNITED STATESGoods and services
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 29, 2010 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 2, 2009 | PETD | PETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED | — |
| Nov 5, 2008 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Oct 24, 2008 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Oct 20, 2008 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 20, 2008 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 20, 2008 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 18, 2008 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 18, 2008 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 17, 2008 | UNDN | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN | — |
| Apr 2, 2008 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 31, 2008 | UNDN | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN | — |
| Mar 12, 2008 | PGEX | PETITION GRANTED - EXTENSION REQUEST FILED | — |
| Mar 5, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 14, 2008 | PETL | COMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER | — |
| Feb 14, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 17, 2008 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Dec 31, 2007 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Dec 31, 2007 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 31, 2007 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 31, 2007 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 19, 2007 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Dec 19, 2007 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 6, 2007 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 19, 2007 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jan 30, 2007 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 19, 2006 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 26, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 6, 2006 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 6, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 12, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 10, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 30, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 30, 2006 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 30, 2006 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 30, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 27, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 10, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |