Drawing for BAROQUE ENCORE

USPTO serial 78831530

BAROQUE ENCORE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BESCH, JAY C
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with BAROQUE ENCORE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Robert E. Bushnell

Robert E. Bushnell Robert E. Bushnell & Law Firm2029 K Street, N.W., Suite 600Washington, DC 20006-1004UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035RETAIL FURNITURE STORES; RETAIL STORE SERVICES FEATURING FURNITURE; AND RETAIL FURNITURE STORE SERVICESACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 4, 2009MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 4, 2009ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 8, 2009TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Nov 1, 2008EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Oct 6, 2008EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Oct 6, 2008CORVREVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE—
Oct 2, 2008AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Oct 1, 2008EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Oct 1, 2008EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Oct 1, 2008MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Apr 1, 2008NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jan 8, 2008PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 19, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Dec 3, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Nov 19, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 19, 2007XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Nov 19, 2007GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Nov 19, 2007GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Nov 19, 2007CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Nov 1, 2007EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Nov 1, 2007JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Oct 31, 2007EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Apr 24, 2007GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 24, 2007CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 3, 2007ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Apr 3, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 3, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Feb 28, 2007MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 12, 2006UNPRUNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 4, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 4, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 4, 2006FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Aug 29, 2006UNPRUNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 28, 2006GPRAPRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Aug 28, 2006CPRAPRIORITY ACTION WRITTENA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Aug 24, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 24, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 23, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 26, 2006ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Mar 15, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance