USPTO serial 78831806
IYOMU
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- WIENER, MICHAEL
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 108 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with IYOMU?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Auckland, NZ
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Advertising services via the Internet; commercial information services via the Internet, namely, information services relating to the field of employment; advertising via electronic media, namely, the Internet; consultancy of personnel recruitment; dissemination of advertising for others via an online communications network on the Internet; dissemination of advertising for others via the Internet; employment counseling and recruiting; employment hiring, recruiting, placement, staffing and career networking services; information management services relating to the field of employment, namely, shipment processing, preparing shipping documents and invoices, tracking documents, packages and freight over computer networks, intranets and internets; online business services in the nature of information, advisory and consultancy services relating to business and management or business administration; personnel placement and recruitment | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 18, 2008 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 18, 2008 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 20, 2007 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 20, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 20, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 30, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 28, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 28, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 30, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 27, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 27, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 26, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 26, 2007 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Apr 26, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 21, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 21, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 6, 2006 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 6, 2006 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 5, 2006 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 4, 2006 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 4, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 28, 2006 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 28, 2006 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 25, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 16, 2006 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Mar 15, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |