USPTO serial 78831965
CALIFORNIA ANGELS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- STINE, DAVID
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with CALIFORNIA ANGELS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Mary L. Kevlin
Mary L. Kevlin COWAN LIEBOWITZ & LATMAN, P.C.1133 Avenue of the AmericasNew York, NY 10036-6799UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | Clothing, namely, visors, knitted headwear, headbands, bandanas, tank tops, blouses, sweaters, turtlenecks, pullovers, vests, shorts, pants, slacks, dresses, skirts, overalls, bodysuits, warm-up suits, jogging suits, sweatshirts, sweatpants, underwear, boxer shorts, robes, sleepwear, thermal loungewear, nightshirts, nightgowns, swimwear, clothing wraps, coats, jackets, ponchos, raincoats, cloth bibs, infantwear, infant diaper covers, cloth diaper sets with undershirt and diaper cover, jumpers, rompers, coveralls, creepers, baby booties, toddler anklets, ties, suspenders, belts, money belts, mittens, gloves, wristbands, earmuffs, scarves, footwear, socks, hosiery, slippers, aprons, sliding girdles and Halloween and masquerade costumes | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 26, 2009 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 26, 2009 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 9, 2008 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jul 9, 2008 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 26, 2008 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 26, 2008 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jun 26, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 1, 2008 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 30, 2008 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Jan 30, 2008 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jan 30, 2008 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 25, 2008 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 25, 2008 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 26, 2007 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Dec 26, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 26, 2007 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 3, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 14, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 21, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 21, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 17, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jan 16, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 16, 2007 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 16, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 16, 2007 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jan 16, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 4, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jan 4, 2007 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 4, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 24, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 23, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 23, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 15, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |